In a way it’s kind of funny to see what is happening to my readers. Because I’m aware of the fact that you don’t really like some of what I post because so much is proTrump.

Well,what you don’t realize is these are the postings of a very lonely old man. If you check you’ll see I’ve NEVER solicited for money. You’re not hurting me financially. If anything you’re trying to make my life more lonely. But when it’s already at ZERO how can you make it any less?

You don’t understand why I called my site what I did. I’m shouting from the roof to anyone who will listen. Because I have no one who does listen to me in my family. I’m calling out to anyone who MAY be passing by.

You don’t like what I post? Okay. You’re probably not the only ones. But I’m not going to be cowed into accepting what you might say either. I’m too old, alone, and stubborn. I’m a Vietnam veteran, and proud of it. I refuse to surrender what I believe just because YOU don’t like it.

If a little old man like me can frighten you so much, so easily, then you are a smaller, petty operation than people truly realize. You’re afraid of open discourse. Yet THAT is the VERY thing that makes us stronger and better.

Go ahead shut me down. Show me how “BIG” and POWERFUL you really are. Squash this little bug. Who will ever notice? It’s funny that you are that afraid of ME! Afraid of my thoughts. Afraid of what I might post.


No problem.

What you fail to understand is that I use this site to vent my frustrations with what is going on.

It doesn’t matter to me if I don’t get any money for my efforts. That’s not why I am doing what I am. I have no sponsors, and I don’t ask for contributions because I’m not doing this for that purpose.

The only way you could truly frustrate me would be if you were to shut me down completely. But for what reason? What rules have I violated? Do you really want to infringe on my right to free speech? After all, all I’m doing is reposting stories I’m finding already on the internet. I’m not commenting on their content.

Shadow Censorship

I have heard that WordPress is Shadow Censoring conservative blogs that use their website. At first I didn’t think they would censor me. I thought I was too small of a site to matter, but I have noticed a tremendous drop off in my visitors over the past few months.

If they are doing that to me there’s one thing they fail to understand. I don’t do this to make money or for a living. I’m a single individual venting my feelings and sharing stories to those who come to my site. They can’t hurt me. Two times now I have started out with no visitors. If I’ve done it twice, I can do it a third time as well.

I’m disappointed in WordPress, if that’s what’s happening to me. But it will take more to stop me. Push comes to shove I’ll just go to another service.

Alexander: The Demo Kavanaugh Blockade

Subject: Alexander: The Demo Kavanaugh Blockade

Alexander’s Column · Sept. 5, 2018 Read Online Subscription

Obstruction of Justice: The Demo Kavanaugh Blockade

Dick Durbin (D-IL): “Why [are these protests] happening for the first time in the history of this committee? … You are the nominee of President Donald John Trump.”

Mark Alexander

“Judges, therefore, should be always men of learning and experience in the laws, of exemplary morals, great patience, calmness, coolness, and attention. Their minds should not be distracted with jarring interests; they should not be dependent upon any man, or body of men.” —John Adams (1776)

Last week, the left-leaning (to put it kindly) American Bar Association awarded Brett Kavanaugh its highest endorsement, a unanimous “Well-Qualified” rating. According to ABA guidelines, “The rating of ‘Well Qualified’ is reserved for those found to merit the Committee’s strongest affirmative endorsement.”

This endorsement used to be the gold standard for Democrats considering Republican judicial appointments. So what’s the holdup on Donald Trump’s nomination of Judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court of the United States?

Well, four reasons: 1) the election of Donald Trump; 2) the resulting epidemic of Trump Derangement Syndrome; 3) pandering and political theater, Democrat Party style; and, finally, 4) a deep sense of remorse by Democrats that they killed the filibuster for judicial nominations in 2013 to clear the way for a slew of Barack Obama’s far-left nominees.

Democrats have set about to make as much trouble for Trump as possible in their relentless effort to delegitimize his election. This hyper-partisan dialogue has devolved into very uncivil discourse even in the once-august Senate chamber, which has lately become a proving ground for leftist ideologues positioning themselves for a 2020 presidential run.

What became of Senate civility? Same four points outlined above.

Let’s briefly review the context for the current Senate SCOTUS deliberations.

As you recall, after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in February 2016, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) deferred Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland to SCOTUS, insisting, “The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.”

McConnell deflected protests by declaring, “We’re following the ‘Biden Rule.’ Biden was chairman of the Judiciary Committee in 1992, in a presidential election year. He said the Senate should not act on filling a Supreme Court vacancy if it had occurred [in a presidential election year]. … So, all we’re doing … is following a long-standing tradition of not filling vacancies on the Supreme Court in the middle of a presidential election year.”

McConnell’s bold action to delay Senate consideration of Obama’s nominee until after the 2016 election was one of the most consequential moves by any Senate leader in decades. McConnell, who has oft been chastised as an “establishment Republican,” deserves full credit for this gambit, which returned enormous dividends in support of a Supreme Court now controlled by a razor-thin 5-4 majority of those who respect our Constitution, rather than those who loathe it.

Justice Scalia was the Supreme Court’s strongest voice for Rule of Law, the “original intent” of our Constitution as opposed to the Left’s so-called living constitution. To that end, he wrote, “As long as judges tinker with the Constitution to ‘do what the people want,’ instead of what the document actually commands, politicians who pick and confirm new federal judges will naturally want only those who agree with them politically.”

Thus, after Trump’s stunning defeat of Obama’s leftist successor, Hillary Clinton, his first SCOTUS nomination to fill the Scalia vacancy was Judge Neil Gorsuch, an originalist in the mold of Justice Scalia.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) pledged that Democrats would filibuster the Gorsuch nomination, and he laughably insisted, “The irresistible, immutable logic is, if the nominee doesn’t get 60 [votes], you change the nominee, not the rules.” But in 2013, when then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) changed the rules for federal bench nominees to avoid filibuster, Schumer proclaimed, “We much prefer the risk of up or down votes and majority rule [on judicial nominees] than the risk of continued total obstruction. That’s the bottom line no matter who’s in power.”

So McConnell did the unthinkable — he played by the same rules that Obama, Reid, and Schumer had in order to bypass a Republican filibuster.

Then came the Demos’ worst judicial nightmare: Their fervent hope that no other SCOTUS seat would open up before they could retake the Senate in the 2018 midterms was dashed when Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement in June.

That brings us to this week, as Trump nominee Brett Kavanaugh began his four-day interrogation by Senate Demo-gogues.

It’s clear that obstruction is the only option Democrats have. They don’t possess the numeric edge to defeat the Kavanaugh nomination, especially now that Arizona’s Republican governor, Doug Ducey, is appointing former Sen. John Kyl to fill the seat of the recently deceased John McCain. So they began the hearings yesterday by rudely and childishly protesting and then attempting to adjourn.

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) had only spoken a few introductory words before being interrupted loudly by Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), who protested, “We cannot possibly move forward, Mr. Chairman, with this hearing. We have not been given an opportunity to have a meaningful hearing on this nominee.”

Democrats are complaining that they haven’t had enough time to review all of the documents on Kavanaugh’s career. But it was they who demanded all the records — another stalling tactic. The National Archives released more than twice as many records on Kavanaugh as the last five judicial nominees combined. Now Democrats are griping that they haven’t had time to read them all.

And regarding the “opportunity” for review, the average time between nominations and hearings for the last 10 Supreme Court nominees was 41 days. It has been 64 days since President Trump nominated Judge Kavanaugh.

Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) used his time to audition for the 2020 presidential campaign, insisting that Kavanaugh’s decisions favor “the powerful, the privileged, big corporations, [and] special interests,” and that “over and over again, folks that lose are the folks that are why I came to Washington to fight: working folks, consumers, women, immigrants, minorities, the disadvantaged, the poor.”

That was followed with a cluster of rancorous Demo howls calling for adjournment, led by Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and the usual leftist Senate suspects: Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Patrick Leahy (D-VT), and Dick Durbin (D-IL).

So rude, contentious, and disgraceful was the behavior of adolescent Democrats and their anti-Kavanaugh cabal of gallery hecklers (70 of whom were arrested), that Judge Kavanaugh’s wife, Ashley, removed their young daughters Margaret and Liza from the hearing room.

At least Durbin was honest about the pathetic rants: “Why is this happening for the first time in the history of this committee? I think we need to be honest about why it’s happening. … You are the nominee of President Donald John Trump.”

Feigning reason and restraint, Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), the ranking Demo on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said, “I really regret this, but I think you have to understand the frustration on this side of the aisle.”

In response, Grassley warned, “We are going to be in session Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday, ’til we get done this week.”

Responding to the Demo-toddler temper tantrums, Ted Cruz (R-TX) told Kavanaugh, “I’m sorry that your daughters had to endure the political circus of this morning. … I believe this fight is nothing more and nothing less than an attempt by our Democratic colleagues to relitigate the 2016 election. … The Democratic obstruction today is all about trying to reverse that election.”

And Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE) offered a brief civics lesson on why SCOTUS confirmation hearings have become so contentious.

Assuming some degree of civility returns to the Senate, Democrats will likely focus on Kavanaugh’s views on executive privilege, as Demos want to remove Trump from office by any means necessary. “I’ll tell you that will be front and center,” insisted Durbin.

No doubt they’ll also grill Judge Kavanaugh on his opposition to the killing of children before birth and on his position on what’s left of Obama’s so-called “Affordable Care Act.”

As consummate race-baiters, Democrats will certainly try to vilify the nominee for his color blindness on civil rights. “Kavanaugh is extreme even by the right-wing, far-right ideological standards of this administration,” wailed Blumenthal, the main obstructionist of the first day’s proceedings. “I’m willing to wager there’s a smoking gun here.”

And, of course, they’ll grill him on his opinions in support of the Second Amendment to gauge how much of an obstacle he’ll be to their objective of obstructing and repealing “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms.”

Leftists have framed the contest for the Supreme Court as “Republican v. Democrat,” but it’s really about judicial authority v. judicial despotism. SCOTUS has moved ever closer to the “despotic branch” that Thomas Jefferson warned of so long ago, in which the Constitution becomes “a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary which they may twist and shape into any form they please.”

The debate, then, is not about Right v. Left but about Liberty v. tyranny. John Stossel puts that into context in a short video about the Kavanaugh nomination.

All the petty rancor aside, by the end of the week, the country should have Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

As I noted prior to the last presidential election, I supported Trump primarily because of his commitment to nominate constitutional constructionists to the Supreme Court. I also noted repeatedly that the presidential election was “much more than a quadrennial vote — it is a quarter-century vote for the composition of the Supreme Court.”

Clearly, Trump’s 2016 victory was a generational victory for Liberty, much to the Left’s consternation.

Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis
Pro Deo et Libertate — 1776

— Support The Patriot Fund —
Subscribe—It’s Right. It’s Free. Manage Your Subscription The Patriot Post Shop
You have received this email because you are subscribed to The Patriot Post.  To manage your subscription or to unsubscribe, please click here.
To help ensure timely delivery of your subscription, please add no-reply@patriotpost.us to your email address book and/or “safe senders” list.
The Patriot Post is protected speech pursuant to the “unalienable rights” of all men, and the First (and Second) Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. In God we trust. Copyright © 2018 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.
REPRINTING, FORWARDING AND POSTING: Subscribers may reprint, forward or post original content from The Patriot Post, in whole or part, in accordance with our Terms of Use, with the following citation: “The Patriot Post ( https://patriotpost.us/subscribe )”
The Patriot Post
PO Box 507
Chattanooga, TN, 37401


HVO Status Report 20180904_1338

Subject: HVO Status Report 20180904_1338

U.S. Geological Survey
Tuesday, September 4, 2018, 1:38 PM HST (Tuesday, September 4, 2018, 23:38 UTC)

19°25’16” N 155°17’13” W, Summit Elevation 4091 ft (1247 m)
Current Volcano Alert Level: WATCH
Current Aviation Color Code: ORANGE

Kīlauea summit and lower East Rift Zone

Seismicity remains low and ground deformation is negligible at the summit of Kīlauea Volcano. Earthquakes, probably aftershocks of the magnitude-6.9 earthquake in early May, continue on South Flank faults.

On the volcano’s lower East Rift Zone (LERZ), the UAS crew confirmed that weak lava activity was present in the fissure 8 cone this morning with no lava extending outside the walls of the cone and no flows heading down the spillway.

Sulfur dioxide emission rates at the summit, Puʻu ʻŌʻō, and LERZ are drastically reduced; the combined rate (< 1,000 t/d) is lower than at any time since late 2007. SO2 emission rate measurements from LERZ vents were slightly higher than those measured in the past week but still low.

HVO crews were successful in restoring communication to most of the monitoring stations on the east side of the island where data communications were disrupted by the passage of Hurricane/Tropical Storm Lane.

The Hawaiian Volcano Observatory (HVO) continues to closely monitor Kīlauea’s seismicity, deformation, and gas emissions for any sign of reactivation, and maintains visual surveillance of the summit and LERZ as best we can. Ground and drone crews are in the field today but continue to be hampered by weather conditions.

HVO will continue to issue daily updates and additional messages as needed. The next update will be issued tomorrow morning unless significant changes occur.


Subscribe to these messages: https://volcanoes.usgs.gov/vns2/

Webcam images: https://volcanoes.usgs.gov/volcanoes/kilauea/multimedia_webcams.html

Photos/Video: https://volcanoes.usgs.gov/volcanoes/kilauea/multimedia_chronology.html

Lava Flow Maps: https://volcanoes.usgs.gov/volcanoes/kilauea/multimedia_maps.html

Definitions of terms used in update: https://volcanoes.usgs.gov/volcanoes/kilauea/extra/definitions.pdf

Overview of Kīlauea summit (Halemaʻumaʻu) and East Rift Zone (Puʻu ʻŌʻō ) eruptions:

Summary of volcanic hazards from Kīlauea eruptions:

Recent Earthquakes in Hawai’i (map and list):

Explanation of Volcano Alert Levels and Aviation Color Codes:



The Hawaiian Volcano Observatory is one of five volcano observatories within the U.S. Geological Survey and is responsible for monitoring volcanoes and earthquakes in Hawai`i.

Veniaminof Volcano Activity Notice 20180904_1309

Subject: Veniaminof Volcano Activity Notice 20180904_1309

AVO/USGS Volcanic Activity Notice

Volcano: Veniaminof (VNUM #312070)

Current Volcano Alert Level: WATCH
Previous Volcano Alert Level: ADVISORY

Current Aviation Color Code: ORANGE
Previous Aviation Color Code: YELLOW

Issued: Tuesday, September 4, 2018, 1:09 PM AKDT
Source: Alaska Volcano Observatory
Notice Number:
Location: N 56 deg 11 min W 159 deg 23 min
Elevation: 8225 ft (2507 m)
Area: Alaska Peninsula

Volcanic Activity Summary: Seismic activity remains elevated at Veniaminof. Low-level ash emissions have been observed in web camera images and have been confirmed by observers in Perryville. Thus, AVO is raising the Aviation Color Code to Orange and the Volcano Alert Level to Watch.

Recent Observations:
[Volcanic cloud height] 8000-10,000ft
[Other volcanic cloud information] Low-level ash emissions.

Remarks: Mount Veniaminof volcano is an andesitic stratovolcano with an ice-filled 10-km diameter summit caldera located on the Alaska Peninsula, 775 km (480 mi) southwest of Anchorage and 35 km (22 mi) north of Perryville. Veniaminof is one of the largest (~300 cubic km; 77 cubic mi) and most active volcanic centers in the Aleutian Arc and has erupted at least 13 times in the past 200 years. Recent significant eruptions of the volcano occurred in 1993-95, 2005, and 2013. These were Strombolian eruptions that produced lava fountains and minor emissions of ash and gas from the main intracaldera cone. During the 1993-95 activity, a small lava flow was extruded, and in 2013, five small lava flows effused from the intracaldera cone over about five months. Minor ash-producing explosions occurred nearly annually between 2002 and 2010. Previous historical eruptions have produced ash plumes that reached 20,000 ft above sea level (1939 and 1956) and ash fallout that blanketed areas within about 40 km (25 mi) of the volcano (1939).

Contacts: Michelle Coombs, Scientist-in-Charge, USGS
mcoombs@usgs.gov (907) 786-7497

David Fee, Coordinating Scientist, UAF
dfee1@alaska.edu (907) 322-4085

Next Notice: A new VAN will be issued if conditions change significantly or alert levels are modified. While a VAN is in effect, regularly scheduled updates are posted at

The Alaska Volcano Observatory is a cooperative program of the U.S. Geological Survey, the University of Alaska Fairbanks Geophysical Institute, and the Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys.